@article {441, title = {A normalization model of visual search predicts single trial human fixations in an object search task.}, number = {008}, year = {2014}, month = {04/2014}, abstract = {

When searching for an object in a scene, how does the brain decide where to look next? Theories of visual search suggest the existence of a global attentional map, computed by integrating bottom-up visual information with top-down, target-specific signals. Where, when and how this integration is performed remains unclear. Here we describe a simple mechanistic model of visual search that is consistent with neurophysiological and neuroanatomical constraints, can localize target objects in complex scenes, and predicts single-trial human behavior in a search task among complex objects. This model posits that target-specific modulation is applied at every point of a retinotopic area selective for complex visual features and implements local normalization through divisive inhibition. The combination of multiplicative modulation and divisive normalization creates an attentional map in which aggregate activity at any location tracks the correlation between input and target features, with relative and controllable independence from bottom-up saliency. We first show that this model can localize objects in both composite images and natural scenes and demonstrate the importance of normalization for successful search. We next show that this model can predict human fixations on single trials, including error and target-absent trials. We argue that this simple model captures non-trivial properties of the attentional system that guides visual search in humans.

}, keywords = {Circuits for Intelligence, Pattern recognition}, author = {Thomas Miconi and Laura Groomes and Gabriel Kreiman} } @article {440, title = {Sensitivity to Timing and Order in Human Visual Cortex.}, number = {005}, year = {2014}, month = {04/2014}, abstract = {

Visual recognition takes a small fraction of a second and relies on the cascade of signals along the ventral visual stream. Given the rapid path through multiple processing steps between photoreceptors and higher visual areas, information must progress from stage to stage very quickly. This rapid progression of information suggests that fine temporal details of the neural response may be important to the how the brain encodes visual signals. We investigated how changes in the relative timing of incoming visual stimulation affect the representation of object information by recording intracranial field potentials along the human ventral visual stream while subjects recognized objects whose parts were presented with varying asynchrony. Visual responses along the ventral stream were sensitive to timing differences between parts as small as 17 ms. In particular, there was a strong dependency on the temporal order of stimulus presentation, even at short asynchronies. This sensitivity to the order of stimulus presentation provides evidence that the brain may use differences in relative timing as a means of representing information.

}, keywords = {Circuits for Intelligence, Pattern recognition, Visual}, author = {Jedediah Singer and Joseph Madsen and WS Anderson and Gabriel Kreiman} } @article {226, title = {Unsupervised learning of invariant representations with low sample complexity: the magic of sensory cortex or a new framework for machine learning?}, number = {001}, year = {2014}, month = {03/2014}, abstract = {

The present phase of Machine Learning is characterized by supervised learning algorithms relying on large sets of labeled examples (n{\textrightarrow}$\infty$). The next phase is likely to focus on algorithms capable of learning from very few labeled examples (n{\textrightarrow}1), like humans seem able to do. We propose an approach to this problem and describe the underlying theory, based on the unsupervised, automatic learning of a {\textquotedblleft}good{\textquotedblright} representation for supervised learning, characterized by small sample complexity (n). We consider the case of visual object recognition though the theory applies to other domains. The starting point is the conjecture, proved in specific cases, that image representations which are invariant to translations, scaling and other transformations can considerably reduce the sample complexity of learning. We prove that an invariant and unique (discriminative) signature can be computed for each image patch, I, in terms of empirical distributions of the dot-products between I and a set of templates stored during unsupervised learning. A module performing filtering and pooling, like the simple and complex cells described by Hubel and Wiesel, can compute such estimates. Hierarchical architectures consisting of this basic Hubel-Wiesel moduli inherit its properties of invariance, stability, and discriminability while capturing the compositional organization of the visual world in terms of wholes and parts. The theory extends existing deep learning convolutional architectures for image and speech recognition. It also suggests that the main computational goal of the ventral stream of visual cortex is to provide a hierarchical representation of new objects/images which is invariant to transformations, stable, and discriminative for recognition{\textemdash}and that this representation may be continuously learned in an unsupervised way during development and visual experience.

}, keywords = {Computer vision, Pattern recognition}, author = {F. Anselmi and JZ. Leibo and Lorenzo Rosasco and Jim Mutch and Andrea Tacchetti and Tomaso Poggio} }