Publication

Found 906 results
[ Author(Asc)] Title Type Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
B
Becker, L. A. et al. Eszopiclone and Zolpidem Produce Opposite Effects on Hippocampal Ripple DensityDataSheet1.docx. Frontiers in Pharmacology 12, (2022).
Becker, L. A., Penagos, H., Manoach, D. S., Wilson, M. A. & Varela, C. Disruption of CA1 Sharp-Wave Ripples by the nonbenzodiazepine hypnotic eszopiclone . Society for Neuroscience (2019).
Bass, I., Smith, K. A., Bonawitz, E. & Ullman, T. Partial Mental Simulation Explains Fallacies in Physical Reasoning. psyArXiv (2021). at <https://psyarxiv.com/y4a8x>
Bashivan, P., Kar, K. & DiCarlo, J. J. Neural Population Control via Deep Image Synthesis. Science 364, (2019).PDF icon Author's last draft (18.45 MB)
Bardon, A., Xiao, W., Ponce, C. R., Livingstone, M. S. & Kreiman, G. Face neurons encode nonsemantic features. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, (2022).
Barbu, A. et al. The Compositional Nature of Event Representations in the Human Brain. (2014).PDF icon CBMM Memo 011.pdf (3.95 MB)
Barbu, A. et al. Seeing is Worse than Believing: Reading People’s Minds Better than Computer-Vision Methods Recognize Actions. (2014).PDF icon CBMM Memo 012.pdf (678.95 KB)
Barbu, A. et al. Computer Vision – ECCV 2014, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 8693, 612–627 (Springer International Publishing, 2014).
Barbu, A., Banda, D. & Katz, B. Deep video-to-video transformations for accessibility with an application to photosensitivity. Pattern Recognition Letters (2019). doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2019.01.019
Barbu, A. et al. ObjectNet: A large-scale bias-controlled dataset for pushing the limits of object recognition models. Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2019) (2019).PDF icon 9142-objectnet-a-large-scale-bias-controlled-dataset-for-pushing-the-limits-of-object-recognition-models.pdf (16.31 MB)
Bansal, A. et al. Neural Dynamics Underlying Target Detection in the Human Brain. Journal of Neuroscience 34, (2014).
Banburski, A. et al. Dynamics & Generalization in Deep Networks -Minimizing the Norm. NAS Sackler Colloquium on Science of Deep Learning (2019).
Banburski, A. et al. Theory III: Dynamics and Generalization in Deep Networks. (2018).PDF icon Original, intermediate versions are available under request (2.67 MB)PDF icon CBMM Memo 90 v12.pdf (4.74 MB)PDF icon Theory_III_ver44.pdf Update Hessian (4.12 MB)PDF icon Theory_III_ver48 (Updated discussion of convergence to max margin) (2.56 MB)PDF icon fixing errors and sharpening some proofs (2.45 MB)
Banburski, A., De La Torre, F., Pant, N., Shastri, I. & Poggio, T. Distribution of Classification Margins: Are All Data Equal?. (2021).PDF icon CBMM Memo 115.pdf (9.56 MB)PDF icon arXiv version (23.05 MB)
Banburski, A. et al. Dreaming with ARC. Learning Meets Combinatorial Algorithms workshop at NeurIPS 2020 (2020).PDF icon CBMM Memo 113.pdf (1019.64 KB)
Banburski, A. et al. Weight and Batch Normalization implement Classical Generalization Bounds . ICML (2019).
Banburski, A. & Rangamani, A. Neural Collapse in Deep Homogeneous Classifiers and the role of Weight Decay. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (2022).
Baldauf, D. & Desimone, R. Neural Mechanisms of Object-Based Attention. Science 344, 424 - 427 (2014).
Baker, C., Jara-Ettinger, J., Saxe, R. & Tenenbaum, J. B. Rational quantitative attribution of beliefs, desires, and percepts in human mentalizing. Nature Human Behavior 1, (2017).PDF icon article.pdf (2.17 MB)
Baidya, A., Dapello, J., DiCarlo, J. J. & Marques, T. Combining Different V1 Brain Model Variants to Improve Robustness to Image Corruptions in CNNs. NeurIPS 2021 (2021). at <https://nips.cc/Conferences/2021/ScheduleMultitrack?event=41268>
Bagus, A. Marliawaty, Marques, T., Sanghavi, S., DiCarlo, J. J. & Schrimpf, M. Primate Inferotemporal Cortex Neurons Generalize Better to Novel Image Distributions Than Analogous Deep Neural Networks Units. NeurIPS (2022). at <https://openreview.net/forum?id=iPF7mhoWkOl>
Bach, F. & Poggio, T. Introduction Special issue: Deep learning. Information and Inference 5, 103-104 (2016).

Pages