|Title||Double descent in the condition number|
|Publication Type||CBMM Memos|
|Year of Publication||2019|
|Authors||Poggio, T, Kur, G, Banburski, A|
In solving a system of n linear equations in d variables Ax=b, the condition number of the (n,d) matrix A measures how much errors in the data b affect the solution x. Bounds of this type are important in many inverse problems. An example is machine learning where the key task is to estimate an underlying function from a set of measurements at random points in a high dimensional space and where low sensitivity to error in the data is a requirement for good predictive performance. Here we report the simple observation that when the columns of A are random vectors, the condition number of A is highest, that is worse, when d=n, that is when the inverse of A exists. An overdetermined system (n>d) and especially an underdetermined system (n<d), for which the pseudoinverse must be used instead of the inverse, typically have significantly better, that is lower, condition numbers. Thus the condition number of A plotted as function of d shows a double descent behavior with a peak at d=n.
- CBMM Funded